Gilani Says Obama Should Do More
Posted: September 16, 2011 Filed under: Humour, Political | Tags: Do More, Pakistan, US Politics 1 Comment »In a moment of uncanny chutzpah, our esteemed Gilani sahab called upon the United States to do more for Pakistan.
“Now it’s the time that they should do more,” the Prime Minister told reporters after attending a ceremony at a girls college here.
If you can read between the lines what he really meant was that Pakistan cannot do more and should not be forced into doing what it clearly cannot do.
He said Pakistan during the last decade had sacrificed much in battling the menace of terrorism and emphasised that it should not be pressurised to do more.
Courtesy: the ever-vigilant @mirza9
Beer, Botal Ya Beedi: Bollywood Beats Featuring Binge Drinking
Posted: September 9, 2011 Filed under: Art, Humour | Tags: Film, Music Leave a comment »Presenting below a compilation of my favourite Bollywood songs featuring drunk heroes and heroines. This list is not strictly chronological but I’ve tried to demonstrate transition from the old Bollywood to the relatively new. If can think of any that I’ve missed out, please share them in the comments section. Would love to see what other favourites exist out there!
Disclaimer: I would loved to write more about them but an analysis would require far more research than I’m inclined to do at this point in time.
1. Dev Anand in ‘Prem Shashtra’ – Mein Sharab Pi Raha Hoon
2. Helen in ‘Gumnaam’ – Pi Ke Hum Chalay
3. Hema Malini in ‘Seeta Aur Geeta’ – Haan Jee Haan Meinay Sharab Pi Hai
4. Rishi Kapoor and Amitabh Bachhan in ‘Naseeb’ – Chal Meray Bhai
5. Amitabh Bachhan in ‘Namak Halal’ – Thori Si Jo Pi Li Hai
6. Jeetendra in ‘Aatish’ – Sharab Hai Shabab Hai
7. Parveen Babi & Mithun Chakraborty in ‘Ashanti’ – Mein Hoon Sharabi
8. Salman Khan and Sri Devi in ‘Chand Ka Tukra’ – Jo Peetay Nahin Sharab
9. Shahrukh Khan and Jackie Shroff in ‘Devdas’ – Chalak Chalak
10. Salman Khan & Sonakshi Sinha in ‘Dabangg’ – Hum Ko Peeni Hai
–
P.S.: Can anyone explain why Pankaj Udhas has so many sad love songs about drinking?! It’s a strangely awkward and intriguing obsession of his.
ad nauseum, ad infinitum.
Posted: May 18, 2011 Filed under: Humour | Tags: Film, Humour, Media, Urdu 1 Comment »For someone who doesn’t like watching TV, I end up watching it quite frequently with surprising gusto. Leaving the telly on while having dinner has inadvertently become the norm even though I was zealously against even owning one just a couple of years ago. If it is not over a meal, it is disguised as spending quality time with family where nobody has to talk if you turn up the volume loud enough.
More often than, watching TV in Pakistan is profoundly irritating.
First of, drama serials would have you believe that every woman in Pakistan is banned from getting an education, forced into marrying her twice divorced 65 year old maternal uncle, thrown into eternal domestic servitude and then beaten up if she wants to visit her mum once in six months. All of this she bears with muted discomfort and still manages to ‘love’ her in laws dearly. If it is not the quintessential voiceless Pakistani woman, it is her anti-thesis: the rebellious brat who has elaborate daddy issues and would rather sleep with whoever’s got more money than deal with her step-mum’s humble rishta requests.
Juxtaposed against these women are two archetypal men: the vadeyrawho has not been able to give adequate time to his daughter after his fifth wife left him because of his alcoholism, and the stupendously chocolate-y hero who woos our heroine with his decency and innocence but basically just wants to get into her pants like everyone else.
Welcome to Pakistan. The land of no in-betweens, no complex characters,and no grey spots in otherwise black and white tales. Our scriptwriters and storytellers are stuck in antediluvian times where every person is either all good or all evil. Pandering to epic clichés in dialogue and horrid deus ex machina moments, Pakistani drama serials have managed to give a whole new meaning to suspension of disbelief. The tragedy is that their collective delusions of grandeur have them thinking they are encouraging critical thinking on Pakistan’s problems. Newsflash: they are not.
Flipping the channel brings no respite. Almost as if mirroring the hysteria on soaps, there is our knightly cavalcade of political analysts, news anchors, pundits and overnight experts who tries it’s earnest to add to the cacophony every night. Somewhere, someone in a newsroom decided that the best way to convince your audience is by shrieking every syllable of your argument. To add to ratings of these shows, imbeciles and self-aggrandizing ‘thought-leaders’ are brought as guests. The idea is to basically surroundthe host with enoughspecialists that the collective IQ in the room goes into minus. Genius.
To assist you in not ever having to put yourself through the deafening din again, I’m going to sum up the totality of their Analysis-On-Everything-Out-There: it is India’s fault. If Rule Number 1 doesn’t apply, please substitute it with Zionist pigs or Degenerate Americans or Venal Politicians or any variation thereof. Works with shocking accuracy each time.
It is quite befitting for a country that has so many complex problems that the best way to think about them is to not do so at all. Or let the good folks on TV do the thinking for you.
If by now you’ve not become comatose, there is always the erstwhile advertisements that will make you finally throw your TV out of maddening rage. There is a Golden Rule when it comes to advertising and I’m pretty sure it is etched in papyrus somewhere. It says ‘annoy the hell out of your audience and they will buy whatever you’re selling’.
There are a few ways one can literally follow this rule. Firstly, creating an adand then playing it over and over and over and over again about 37 times in an hour ad infinitum, ad nauseum. This ensures brand recall. Secondly, by employing the most earth-shatteringly irritating jingles, catch-phrases and slogans you can find. This leads to brand hype. Finally, by lying through your teeth about the product you’re selling. This leads to brand loyalty (hey, who’ll find out anyway?).
And with that we arrive at the brilliant formula being used in Pakistani TV today. Right after a harrowing day at work you nestle in front of the idiot box and switch to your choice of drama serial of the day. Within moments of the opening credits, it cuts to a commercial break. You watch a couple of them thinking the show will be back on any minute. 15 minutes later, it is still commercial break and you’ve watched the same washing power ad bajillion times already. You switch to the talk show on today’s current events. There is an intelligent intro by a senior journalist that has piqued your interest but before you could grasp the nuances of the issue, they introduce their guest of the day. It is the same 3 goons sitting in political opposition who have parroted the exact same non-statement for the nth time. You switch back to the drama serial. By now you missed a good few minutes and a dramatic slap. Your heroine is wailing uncontrollably alone in her room when there is a mysterious phone call. Cut to commercial break.
Lather. Rinse. Repeat.
Pakistan Does More From Time To Time
Posted: May 18, 2011 Filed under: Humour, Political | Tags: Do More, Pakistan, Taliban, Terrorism 1 Comment »At the outset, let me clarify that I do not normally depend on Yahoo! for my news consumption. Having said that, there was a report tweeted by HM Naqvi yesterday enumerating the list of all ‘top’ al-Qaida and Taliban leaders arrested and/or killed in Pakistan.
I’m going to reproduce those arrests and assassinations that were carried out and/or aided/facilitated by Pakistan’s police and armed forces:
- May 2011: Security agencies on Tuesday arrested Al-Qaeda Senior leader Muhammad Ali (Sohaib Al Makki) from Karachi.
- May 2010: Mustafa al-Yazid, al-Qaida’s No. 3 leader and top commander in Afghanistan, was killed in a missile strike in the North Waziristan tribal area near the Afghan border.
- February 2010: Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, the Taliban’s No. 2 leader and top military commander, was captured in Karachi.
- February 2010: Mullah Abdul Kabir, the top Taliban commander in eastern Afghanistan, was arrested at an unknown location.
- December 2009: Saleh al-Somali, a top al-Qaida commander responsible for the group’s operations outside Pakistan and Afghanistan, was killed in a missile strike.
- August 2009: Baitullah Mehsud, leader of the Pakistani Taliban, was killed in a missile strike in the South Waziristan tribal area near the Afghan border.
- January 2009: Usama al-Kini, a top al-Qaida operative suspected of involvement in the 1998 bombings of U.S. embassies in East Africa, was killed in a missile strike.
- January 2009: Sheikh Ahmed Salim Swedan, a top al-Qaida operative suspected of involvement in the 1998 bombings of U.S. embassies in East Africa, was killed in a missile strike.
- October 2008: Abu Jihad al-Masri, a top al-Qaida operative, was killed in a missile strike in North Waziristan.
- September 2008: Abu Haris, a senior al-Qaida commander who led the group’s operations in Pakistan’s tribal areas, was killed in a missile strike in North Waziristan.
- July 2008: Abu Khabab al-Masri, a top al-Qaida commander responsible for the group’s chemical and biological weapons efforts, was killed in a missile strike in South Waziristan.
- January 2008: Abu Laith al-Libi, a top al-Qaida commander in Afghanistan, was killed in a missile strike in North Waziristan.
- December 2005: Hamza Rabia, a senior al-Qaida commander, was killed in a missile strike in North Waziristan.
- May 2005: Abu Farraj al-Libbi, al-Qaida’s No. 3 leader, was detained in northwestern Pakistan.
- July 2004: Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani, an al-Qaida operative suspected in the 1998 bombings of U.S. embassies in East Africa, was arrested after a gunbattle in Gujrat in eastern Pakistan.
- June 2004: Nek Mohammed, a top Taliban commander, was killed in a missile strike in South Waziristan.
- March 2003: Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the suspected mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks, was captured in Rawalpindi.
- Sept. 2002: Ramzi Binalshibh, a would-be Sept. 11 hijacker who could not get into the United States, was detained in Karachi.
- March 2002: Abu Zubaydah, al-Qaida’s suspected financier, was arrested in Faisalabad.
Stuff it, do-more naysayers!
Australia Urges Pakistan To Do More
Posted: May 6, 2011 Filed under: Humour, Political | Tags: Do More, Terrorism Leave a comment »Australia said Friday Pakistan must do more to counter terrorism but cautioned against jumping to conclusions over Islamabad’s efforts to track down Osama bin Laden.
Et tu, Brutus?
And then in fine print: Australia is one of Pakistan’s biggest providers of military training.
Courtesy: http://www.dawn.com/2011/05/06/australia-urges-pakistan-to-do-more-in-terror-fight.html
Pakistan Tells The CIA To Do LESS!
Posted: April 13, 2011 Filed under: Humour | Tags: Do More, Terrorism, US Politics 2 Comments »If you still have some free articles left to read on New York Times (curse the paywall!), please don’t miss this gem:
“We’re telling the Americans: ‘You have to trust the ISI or you don’t. There is nothing in between.’ ”
Well. Glad that’s sorted, then.
Seriously, this whole piece is #winning.
Liberals Are Dead! Long Live The Liberals!
Posted: March 11, 2011 Filed under: Humour | Tags: Class, Pakistan, Taliban, The Left 2 Comments »I’m not sure if you’ve heard but word on the street is that there’s an important species about to become extinct in Pakistan.
Even if you’ve not seen one yourself, chances are you hear about them every single day. Nary a day goes by without reading about this particular breed of being in every single newspaper and magazine published here. We’re collectively bombarded about this group’s existential crisis so much that it seems that it is perhaps the most important group in Pakistan.
If it’s not obvious enough, I’m talking about the so-called death of liberals in Pakistan. Liberals as a species are dying and soon enough will be extinct. I should know because I am one. Suddenly we seem to have woken up to the idea that our existence is under threat because of some amorphous, intractable, violent monster also known as the “Other”.
Because we are the educated, well-heeled lot, having had access to all institutions this country has to offer, we obviously know better than “all of them” who are the illogical, dangerous lot out to kill us. Of course we do not blame anyone but them for their lack of education, opportunity and “middle class” mindset. Had they just tried hard enough like we all did, they too would have been smarter, successful and better smelling. And of course to ‘us’, they are a unified, homogenous entity with an agenda: the liberals versus the non-liberals, the hoity-toity versus the hoi polloi, the You-and-Me’s versus the All-of-Them’s. There’s no one left in between ‘us’, the enlightened, and ‘them’, the emboldened!
The audacity of these non-liberal sorts is getting appalling. Why, just the other day I was at the signal waiting for the red light to turn green, when the pesky little kid started cleaning the windshield of my car without my consent! Have they no manners? And that irritating lady who simultaneously continued rapping at my car window while I was just trying to listen to my music in peace? The woman had no sense of privacy or decency! How dare they intrude on my life? I certainly do not intrude on theirs, do I?
What could possibly be more ridiculous than forty thousand of these illiterate buffoons showing up on the streets to celebrate the murder of one of us? Is there a more stark proof of how utterly outnumbered we are on the streets of Pakistan? Our once impervious, protected space has been hit by a stampede, and now ‘they’ are not taking no for an answer.
As if that wasn’t enough, now more and more of them want better wages. Worker strikes have become commonplace due to some bizarre imagination on their part. (That must be it, right?) They have suddenly realized that they should get the sort of wages us liberals do without getting even remotely more educated or talented.
I went to a meeting recently where concerned liberals who owned these companies were discussing how to get rid of their employees with minimum inconvenience. One of the smartest liberals in the meeting said that we should tell these workers to “suck it up”. Because this particular clever liberal owns an NGO and had obviously thought a lot about poor, ignorant people, we all thought it was indeed an astute observation.
I’m not sure when we ceded political space to these goons we love to hate, but I have a dreaded feeling we never really participated in the national conversation in the first place. This intellectually superior group of ours (or the most recent mutation of it anyway) was always too busy to attend a political rally, too pensive to distribute pamphlets door-to-door, and far too wise to mingle with the masses. It is beneath us to persuade the proletariat, dahlin’.
So how do we escape this horrible situation? How do we ensure that our dying breed survives? We’re not willing to reproduce as much as them. We’re not willing to become less intelligent or attractive either. We don’t even want to meet these people to learn about their survival instincts. (Natural selection, anyone?)
The only way we can overcome this existential threat is to utilize a three-pronged approach. First we need to build an even more robust infrastructure that keeps the non-liberals out of our space. We need to have more clubs, hotels, restaurants and airports that are exclusive and inaccessible to anyone who does not subscribe to our liberal lifestyle. Secondly, we need to make private education and private healthcare even more expensive. The former will ensure our liberals are smarter and richer, and at least a few them can employ critical thinking if there is an extreme need for it. The latter will ensure that non-liberals die out by way of natural selection. Lastly, we need to continue writing and ranting in English newspapers (like this one) so that fellow liberals are aware of our dilemma. Everyone needs to know just how bad things are for us now that we can’t even publicly announce that we will not fast or pray at work.
I’ve done my part in helping to save us by letting you know what’s really plaguing our country. I can now relax in liberal complacency and enjoy being the cleverest liberal on the block.
Speak now or forever hold your piece.
This piece was published in The Friday Times on 11 March 2011 and also be read here.
Obama Says Do More (Like India Does)
Posted: November 8, 2010 Filed under: Humour, Political | Tags: Do More, Imperialism, Terrorism, US Politics Leave a comment »Obama’s in New Delhi and he chose, like David Cameron, to use that precise platform to urge Pakistan to, you guessed it, do more.
Islamabad was making progress against what he called the ‘cancer’ of extremism but not quickly enough. “Progress is not as quick as we would like,” he added.
Please note that he also said that US would not do more.
Obama made it clear that the US would not ‘impose’ itself on Indo-Pak relations.
(which is double-speak for: Don’t Ask Nothing About Kashmir)
Fair enough, Mr President Sir, I’ll step right on it.
Source: This newspaper and This man.
A Page From Said’s Diary On Sartre, Beauvoir, Foucault
Posted: July 28, 2010 Filed under: Academia, Humour, Political | Tags: Foucault, Homosexuality, Post-Colonialism, The Left, The Palestinian Cause 10 Comments »Edward Said loves shattering your academic heroes. In a seminar on the Middle East in Paris in 1974, he met Sartre, Beauvoir and Foucault at Foucault’s apartment and was disappointed in their pro-Zionist political stances. The amusing entry in his diary on the entire episode can be found here in its entirety but here are some brilliant anecdotes:
On Beauvoir:
Beauvoir was already there in her famous turban, lecturing anyone who would listen about her forthcoming trip to Teheran with Kate Millett, where they were planning to demonstrate against the chador; the whole idea struck me as patronising and silly, and although I was eager to hear what Beauvoir had to say, I also realised that she was quite vain and quite beyond arguing with at that moment.
Beauvoir had been a serious disappointment, flouncing out of the room in a cloud of opinionated babble about Islam and the veiling of women. At the time I did not regret her absence; later I was convinced she would have livened things up.
On Foucault:
In their biographies, both Didier Eribon and James Miller reveal that in 1967 [Michel Foucault] had been teaching in Tunisia and had left the country in some haste, shortly after the June War. Foucault had said at the time that the reason he left had been his horror at the ‘anti-semitic’ anti-Israel riots of the time, common in every Arab city after the great Arab defeat. A Tunisian colleague of his in the University of Tunis philosophy department told me a different story in the early 1990s: Foucault, she said, had been deported because of his homosexual activities with young students. I still have no idea which version is correct.
At the time of the Paris seminar, he told me he had just returned from a sojourn in Iran as a special envoy of Corriere della sera. ‘Very exciting, very strange, crazy,’ I recall him saying about those early days of the Islamic Revolution. I think (perhaps mistakenly) I heard him say that in Teheran he had disguised himself in a wig, although a short while after his articles appeared, he rapidly distanced himself from all things Iranian. Finally, in the late 1980s, I was told by Gilles Deleuze that he and Foucault, once the closest of friends, had fallen out over the question of Palestine, Foucault expressing support for Israel, Deleuze for the Palestinians.
On Sartre:
Sartre’s presence, what there was of it, was strangely passive, unimpressive, affectless. He said absolutely nothing for hours on end. At lunch he sat across from me, looking disconsolate and remaining totally uncommunicative, egg and mayonnaise streaming haplessly down his face. I tried to make conversation with him, but got nowhere. He may have been deaf, but I’m not sure.
For reasons that we still cannot know for certain, Sartre did indeed remain constant in his fundamental pro-Zionism. Whether that was because he was afraid of seeming anti-semitic, or because he felt guilt about the Holocaust, or because he allowed himself no deep appreciation of the Palestinians as victims of and fighters against Israel’s injustice, or for some other reason, I shall never know. All I do know is that as a very old man he seemed pretty much the same as he had been when somewhat younger: a bitter disappointment to every (non-Algerian) Arab who admired him.
[P.S: Said's comment on Foucault's homosexuality was unnecessary and in bad taste but he's defended himself in the comments]
Clinton Says Do More (Again)
Posted: July 27, 2010 Filed under: Humour, Political | Tags: Do More, Terrorism, US Politics Leave a comment »I’m a little late to the party but apparently Hillary Clinton took out her precious time to come all the way to Islamabad to tell us little people how much more we need to be doing. Oh, and there were no pat on the backs.
