Queer Misgivings

This post was shared with me over e-mail by a friend (let’s call him Chatkhara!). It moved me in many ways and broke my heart a little bit. I’m going to share it here because it’s really too wonderful to be denied an audience.  

***

I’ve been meaning to commit to text my hamjinsual musings for sometime, and often an unorganized rant is the best way to form a question. I’m not very well read in either queer studies, feminist theory, or gender and I apologize for the lacunae in thought, hiccups in phraseology, and those moments where my ignorance shines the brightest. I’m working hard to learn, read, and all I ask for is the ability to ask better, bolder questions.

I was trolling the Facebook the other day and happened upon a queer discovery: people celebrate their coming-out anniversaries. My friend’s ten year anniversary is fast approaching and he wondered in text, “what should I do?” He implored the help of others in his queer community and asked how they celebrated ‘the big day.’ I’m a particularly vain individual, and so it shouldn’t come as any shock that I began to cull my own memory’s archive to return to my last closeted day. Some day in the end of April 2007, my flatmate entered my room and I convinced her to go on a 2 AM stroll with me around my apartment complex. Thirty minutes elapsed and I couldn’t find the strength to summon up those words that I hadn’t had the courage to think, let alone vocalize in a declarative sentence with myself as subject. We returned to our rooms, but somehow I got a second wind and cajoled her into another walk. We went outside, sat by our sad, mildewy apartment pool, and she watched in sadness as the the volcano of emotions erupted from my firey, sad insides. Melodramatic much? I’m not so much sure if my voice worked or not, but the snot, tears, and hysteria that I was spewing did the trick. The secret was out, though it wasn’t much of one to her or to any of my close friends. I felt immediately better and that night I closed my eyes and cozily cocooned myself in some of the most absent minded sleep that I’ve ever had.

But burdens of secrecy are not so easily lifted. Coming-out of the closet is a sick game that heteronormativity rigidly reinforces. Am I never fully out, unless I make the decision to parade a statement, tie my shirt in a knot that reveals my navel, groomed belly, etc? Ok, that was unfair, but now you see how deep the cesspit of heteronormativity is. I had to have “the talk” with each close friend, where I sat them down and revealed that my erstwhile existence had been a cheap lie. It turns out, I was the real victim of the secret that everyone knew, but I was too ashamed to acknowledge. No one cared, and I consider it my good fortune that I have friends that are wonderful enough to love me for who I am when I wasn’t too sure.

I’ve started to make more strides to join the gay community, make queer friends, investigate the “scene,” if you will. I bring with me my disgusting anthropological faux-empirical gaze and now, more and more, my queer body into supposedly friendly spaces. And it initially feels good to belong to a community of people that share a similar marginalized self. But this fuzzy feeling soon dissipates and I discover that queer communities can be just as fucked up and othering as non-queer ones. On my quest to “belong,” I made the assumption that a queer community a) can exist and b) would be a place for me to belong. I didn’t realize that I essentialized a group but assumed that we would have a similar experience that united us. “Am I gay enough,” I began to wonder in self doubt. Do I have license to police the f-word, a word that I was humiliatingly subjected to everyday of my teenage life? Am I supposed to have a vitriolic opinion on Will and Grace?

It is appropriate for me to mention that I am non-white, and for most of my life I have identified and associated myself with white, straight individuals. My self-hate created a discomfort in South Asian circles, as being queer and brown carries a weight to heavy to bear. I’ll spare you the triteness of the “quest for belonging” story because that narrative is hackneyed and mainly untrue. I was quite happy on the margins, listening to Fergie and System of the Down, anyway.

I had never been attracted to South Asians before, and so when I began dating last year (four years out of the closet), I started to look for gay South Asians or “gaysis.” (As is often the story, the Shiv Sena makes a cameo on one date when I interacted with a hintutva guy. And no, it wasn’t Shiva’s phallic projection which led him down the path of ideological Indian middle class hate. The online dating world decided we’d be a match. Go figure! But I digress.)

Towards the end of last year, I met up with a guy at a café in South Delhi for lunch. We didn’t exactly hit it off, which was fine, but I was exited at the possibility of having another South Asian queer friend. As is often the case with queer meet ups, we eventually find ourselves on the topic of our out-ness. “Does your father know” always lingers on the tip of my tongue. I twitch anxiously as I hear the response. A negative response helps me feel calm. “Good, we’re both similarly fucked,” I think in shame. The fear of the outside looking in is one that I’ve overcome, but the dread of my father rejecting the shame of my phallic oriented existence is too much for my comprehension and I get swallowed into the earth.

My date happened to be from one of those fortunate few families where queer identity was not problematic, but education and economic status was. Our similarities ended at skin hew. He was pushed into a humanities education and allowed to be creative. Hurray. Congrats. His family was unenthusiastic about his orientation but still very realistic about his happiness. Great. While his parents where encouraging him to pursue theater, my father taught me about hypotenuses and their vital importance when walking any distance. Anywhere. While my date got soothing pats on the back and a discourse of “it’s all right beta, kuchh nahii hota,” I got lectures on the ethics of a clean room, a nicely sharpened pencil, and wrinkle-less clothing. Brownness and sexual identities are not universally well suited categories for community, I discovered.

I know it seems unfair for me to be consumed by jealousy and resentment, but I can’t help it right now. And I’m not asking for any forgiveness either.

The problems began when it became my turn to share. It wasn’t so much the conversation that threw me a curve ball, but the articulation of the question. The seemingly innocent question was structured as “does your family know?” but his tone condescendingly asserted “surely your parents know!” A question with an answer already built in its premise, its phrasing. HEY, I RECOGNIZE THAT SHIT IN GRADUATE SCHOOL. This wasn’t just gay privilege wagging its nagging middle finger in my face. This was him reminding me that my parents had to be idiots to not see “fag” written all over my forehead. As I am an American, passive aggression ensued. “They probably have an idea, but they only ask about girls, and that’s only when they ask.” He was effervescent with glee, schooling me with the obvious truth. I wanted to punch that disgusting smirk off his face, but as usual, I kowtowed to social decorum. I’m a victim of North Indian tezheeb, the politese of courtly jurisprudence, which causes me to eat my rancor. I calmly replied, “I don’t think it’s realistic that I ever tell them. I can’t expect them to accept me as I am.”

Why is it that “homosexuality” restricts me only to men? “Bisexuality” suggests that I have an affiliation to both genders. Why can’t I be me and be peoplephillic? Textsexual. Textual. Take a good handjob when offered and not worry about the baggage of classifying the binomial nomenclature of the involved parties. “He’s a twink bottom,” or “he’s a faggy guy.” I feel like the biggest problem I have is that I am constantly fleeing categories only to be restricted by others. Great. I’m a fag. Wonderful. Pleased to meet you. Now, please allow me to like women too, if I so choose. I am constantly confronted with reductive assumption that I have no romantic interest in woman or that I am pulled by phallic magnetism to men. It’s exactly the same foolish logic the undergirds homophobia. I’m already forced to explain myself to heteronormative straight folks. Now, I have to fight homonormative rigidity about my my emotional and sexual pluralities. So, when my date assiduously reminded me that I can’t marry a woman in two years when my auspicious marriageable ripeness peaks, my antagonistic insides curled and I wanted to vomit. “Watch me,” I thought in spite. “No,” I calmly answered and bit my tongue like the coward I am. He continued. “Your parents HAVE to know, I mean, how could they not? And you’re going to have to tell them. How could they not know?”

Oh waiter, can I have a glass of wine to splash in this fucker’s face? His incredulous smirk enraged me even more than his ignorance. I am my parents’ son and they don’t interact with me as a sexual being. I was casually asked once a year during my late teens if I had a girlfriend, and I relied on my angry teenage venom to silence their intrusions, just as any child of the 90s would. My parents are lovely people and my closest friends, but they are not products of a socioeconomic upbringing where these questions exist. They don’t read Marx and could careless what painting exhibit came to town two weeks ago. They were concerned with good grades and scholastic performance. My realities are their irrealities. My truths aren’t even manifestations of their imaginary biryani.

My parents left India in the 65 and 80 from staunchly Indian nationalist, military, middle class and upward aspiring households. I know I don’t give them much credit, but a gay son is a tough sell. Their reality may not be black and white, but it certainly doesn’t have the space in its color palate for the bright hues of my fuchsia insides.

Two years ago, I was introduced to the “It Gets Better Project,” a collection of video journal entries from queer and queer-friendly individuals talking about the uphill battle of acceptance. The central argument is to remind a young, mobilized, and relentlessly taunted queer youth that life does improve after one’s teenage years are over. Interest in this video compendium was ignited in response to tragic suicides across the US by teens who just couldn’t handle it anymore. While I support this project in its intention and do plan on making a video myself, I do find some flaws with the narrative, viz. it doesn’t always get better. It might stagnate out of necessity and fade into the corner. It might only get better one hour a week in therapy. It could get worse. The online community’s support has generated a lot of celebrity but this is relatively insignificant in comparison to the structural and societal economies of discrimination and plain honest-to-God hate that children have to undergo everyday, and I see this as exponentially higher in non-white queer circles. “It gets better” is something my white friends can triumphantly trumpet. Others that have the specter of an arranged marriage and the burden of providing grandchildren and income to South Asian parents of a different world view have another dark battle to fight.

I creep back into my heteronormative shell in front of my parents. The return to the congestive closet after five years of open living is murder. My marriage to my filial duty is in competition with my emotional obligation to myself to be happy. The former is still not a human right in my flossy western vatan. How the fuck is that supposed to feel any better? What do I exactly celebrate this April on my fifth year anniversary?


Wither Feminism? Or How I Learned To Stop Worrying & Love Valentine’s Day

An edited version of this appeared in The Friday Times.

Growing up, I was a bit of a nightmare for my parents. My father was the sole authority
on all matters and my mother the passive caretaker. Angered and furious with the
inequality in the whole setup at home, I somewhat unknowingly became a rebel. What
was acceptable to ammi would not be acceptable to me. Whatever I was told, I would
promptly do the opposite. I harbored resentment for my mother for even allowing
her voice to be snatched away. I felt it set the wrong precedent for my decisions
and the path I wanted to carve for myself. I rationalized that she had internalized
that subservience was the key to happiness and maintaining the status quo was her
responsibility. I became a feminist without even realizing it.

My feminism was about having the same curfew as my brothers. My feminism was about
studying economics rather than medicine. My feminism was about wearing sleeveless
and mocking women in burqas. I rebelled so I could teach rather than work in a bank.
I refused to cook and took driving lessons at a very early age. I thought I had figured it
out. I would do everything a man is allowed to do and then some more.

I thought my friends who opted out of careers were wasting their life. I felt like women
who chose to have lots of children were oppressed without even recognizing it. In my
heart I was sure that women who listen to men on what should or should not be like
were ruining it for the rest of us. I was wrong.

I started noticing how much joy and comfort my mother finds in cooking, ironing, and
cleaning for my father and us. I was discomforted by how she made it a labor of love.
Working full time with no pay, she was the happiest performing self-assigned tasks.

At first I reassured myself that she doesn’t know any better, that she’s only seen
a singular life. I trivialized her experience of life as being inferior to mine. It took
so many years for me to see through my biases. My mother was not chained to her
circumstances with no chance of escape from domestic slavery. In fact, she chose to
assert her womanhood in ways that were, although different from mine, equally valid
and independent. She was exercising agency and will every single day; it was me who
had denied it to her. She was not the one in chains, I was.

In some ways my entire belief system came shattering down. In other ways I was
liberated. I saw bikinis and burqas as equal choices, albeit politicized choices in some
cases. To me a high-flying career (in my case, a Ph.D.) was no longer the source for
deriving meaning in life. It was but another way to make my life fulfilling. Marriage no
longer felt like feminist suicide. In many ways a largely stifling institution for many, I
finally saw how it could one day work for me.

Last week was Valentine’s and I thoroughly enjoyed celebrating it in the most
conventional way possible. I did not care whether it was a commercialized charade
aimed at making money. I did not feel the need to rage against The Man deluding us into
creating meaning in our lives. I spent it Valentine’s Day appreciating that the force of
love changes you in dramatic ways. I am on a feminist trajectory even I cannot relate to
anymore. But it is very, very exciting,

This does not mean that complacency in life is the best way to live. This isn’t meant to
be prescriptive at all. There are legitimate injustices to be angry about. There are also
potent ways to challenge those injustices. Writing from a place of privilege, it would
be very hypocritical for me to preach happiness, comfort, and conscious assertion

of personhood. The point is not that one cannot be an angry feminist legitimately.
The point is that there are many ways to practice feminism. There are just as many
feminisms as there are feminists. Each one of us is entitled own idea of what our life
should look like and all ideas are just as feminist. What good is feminism if does not
empower people to do as they please and create meaning in unique ways?

My feminism is not the same anymore. It doesn’t make me angry with other women. It
doesn’t hate men either. It makes me appreciate a woman’s right to choose, cognizant
of her contexts. It makes me curious enough to go beyond the rhetoric and learn about
stories and insights women can give me that I had only assumed before.

I no longer feel sorry for “other” women: women who are separated from me through
class, religion, and race barriers. I do not assume I know what they want more than they
do. It would be wrong of me to speak for anyone but myself. The heady outrage as been
replaced by passive contentment. Heck, I can even see myself quitting my job to take
care of my children one day.


Veena Malik’s Victory Is Not ‘Our’ Victory

Express Tribune boasting increased ratings for Kamran Shahid

Media is pernicious! But it is no laughing matter.

Two weeks ago, not many ‘liberal’ kids had heard of Kamran Shahid, let alone watch his show. Today, there’s a remix on YouTube of Veena Malik’s appearance along with Mufti on his show on Express News. The interview was posted on several websites in its entirety and all of Pakistan’s Facebook-ing awaam shared the same on their profiles. What else could a late night show host possibly want?

The show itself is a double-edged sword, really. On one hand its remarkable that a confidant, articulate and dare I say, sexy actress silenced an Islamic cleric on national television (no mean feat by itself!). On the other hand, however, a misogynist anchor walks away with the highest ratings for basically compiling a cheap-shot video of Veena Malik during Bigg Boss and then insulting her for being the instigator!

Under a more thoughtful, ethical watch such a matter wouldn’t even make headlines. A self-identified Pakistani Muslim actress in a reality TV show is schmoozing with an Indian man. So what? In a country where hunger is rising to epic proportions, militants are getting more conniving and someone gets murdered in defense of what a poor Christian woman said, what Veena Malik does on reality TV is barely controversial. It’s a non-issue.

But then again, it isn’t. It is very much the heart of the plethora of problems plaguing Pakistan. It is yet another reflection of the deep division in society: those who think Veena Malik is a hero for finally having the grace and gall to stand up to the moral police, and those who think Veena Malik did a terrible job of representing Pakistanis abroad. There are no numbers to show how many lie on either side and just how many are in grey, those who either don’t care or can’t afford to care. Veena Malik versus the Mufti may be great late night TV, but when it turns into another Salman Taseer versus Mumtaz Qadri, it is no longer a trivial matter. Moral policing coupled with vigilantism has dangerous consequences and as we’ve seen, the silent majority’s complicity is never held accountable.

The reality TV show Bigg Brother is produced in the same ilk as Big Brother in the UK.

Recall 1984.

The term Big Brother alludes to moral policing, social control, CCTVs, totalitarianism and a wretched Orwellian nightmare. Even though the show borrows the same concept of Big Brother as the ever-watchful, not-so-secret, controlling Man On The Screen, I doubt even Veena Malik had imagined just how much of a dystopia it was going to turn out for her. No one stood up for her when she was being repeatedly insulted while the show was going on. No one stood up for her till she came back and had to stand up for herself.

Admittedly, I was among those who cheered and clapped when I saw Veena Malik defending her womanhood, her right to look good and her role as an entertainer. But then again, when have we, the self-congratulating, pompous liberals ever mobilised for political space in Pakistan? We ceded that space many moons ago when we decided our privilege and comfort was enough to built walls around ourselves. Even those of us who weren’t rich but had afforded ourselves a liberal education thought ourselves too smart to engage in local politics. Why reduce ourselves to that level, we said. And in that misguided arrogance, we lost the right to appropriate Veena Malik’s courage as our own.

It is not ‘our’ victory. It’s Veena Malik’s victory. She was a lone ranger in the battlefield that day.


Metal Detectors

metal detectors

greet me soon as i walk in

beep beep beep

everywhere in pakistan

 

strange, ugly edifices

to protect some civilians

militants killed, however

elsewhere in pakistan

 

they ask for my id

and write down my phone number

it helps the war on terror

somewhere in pakistan

 

they all have the same question

in their eyes

they all want to determine:

am i the terrorist?


Independence Day

A lot of well-intentioned, albeit far too emotional and
superficial, initiatives have come forth in the aftermath of
the worst floods to have hit Pakistan in the last two weeks.
Every day I get countless text messages, invites to Facebook
pages, groups, events and e-mails informing me about where
to donate and how to volunteer at relief efforts. All of this
very important and I hope that most of it eventually ends up
where it is needed the most.

But it’s not enough if the effect of future disasters is to be
mitigated. We cannot prevent earthquakes or floods but we
can strive towards a more equitable society that doesn’t
discriminate against the poorest sections when a disaster
hits.  A more forceful engagement with the state is required,
one that is marked more by political resistance and less by
emotional and reactionary philanthropy. A friend recently
conjectured that what Pakistan needs right now is a massive
class revolt but it’s not likely that it’s going to happen. Most
of us are content with donating just enough so our own
lifestyle goes unchanged and eventually leaving the affected
majority to its own misfortune to pick up the pieces. That is
enough to placate our conscious and ignore our guilt for
unchecked consumption and spending that goes on
uninterrupted. It is a masked hypocrisy that capitalism
necessitates.

Perhaps Žižek can explain this better.The Starbucks ‘ ethical ‘
coffee consumption example, in particular, is brilliant.

It’s almost nauseating to see how many people loved(sic) this
Ufone ad on the Independence Day
celebrations in Pakistan. One friend on Facebook even went
on
to say it was the most amazing ad he’d seen.

What ‘ azaadi ‘? Thank you for what? Exactly who has this
state benefitted? We’re not free in Pakistan. We’ve not been
free since we were colonised, and today we’re enslaved by the
hatred(s) we’ve internalised and the destructive capitalism
coupled with a militaristic rule that we’re learning to
worship. There is NOTHING romantic or glorious about the
partition. There is nothing independent about Pakistan
today.

Instead of proliferating these ridiculous ads that tug at the
nation’s heartstrings by blatantly using people with
disabilities, we should be talking more about the grassroots
victories that the working class underbelly of Pakistan is
achieving . A class revolt may not be in our future but let us
not delude ourselves with a farcical project that is Pakistan.

(This is probably my most indulgent and selfish post and I
can’t promise that it will read as coherently as it appears in
my mind.)


On Adoption As An Ethical Choice

I have been uncomfortable with the idea of having my own children for many years now. Evolutionary instincts aside, my reading of Development Economics, for instance, makes me think that in light of population trends and statistics, the ethical response would be to not have children of you own but adopting children that need a home.

I assure you this has nothing to do with how adoption has become the trendy thing to do after the likes of Angelina Jolie and Madonna stepped in to ‘save the poor African child’. Bizarrely enough, even Sacha Baron Cohen finds this worth mocking in Brüno when he adopts an African child in exchange for an iPod (ugh, by the way). In fact, that is the very dilemma that brings me to this post. The rules and regulations around adoption come with several red flags and challenges which make an ethical choice even more complicated.

One of the foremost concerns is that adoption agencies favour long-term, heterosexual. monogamous relationships. It is nearly impossible for single people to adopt and if you demonstrate yourself to be out of that singular concept of relationships, you might as well drop the idea. Unless you’re Madonna and have that celebrity privilege to have things  your way. While it may be becoming easier for gays or single people to adopt in some parts of the world, by and large trans people and non-monogamous people are denied this choice.

Secondly, how does one choose a child without it being an ableist, racist, classist (add any other ists) choice? What race would you choose and why? What country would you choose and why? Would you be okay with adopting a child with physical disabilities? Would you be okay with adopting a child born with mental disabilities? Would you adopt a child by rich, capitalists parents who just don’t want him/her? Would it make you feel better if it was assured that the child was in fact from a poor family or no family? Every answer to that reveals some biases in us. How do you ensure that you’re not ‘othering’ the child you adopt? Race matters are complex and to adopt from another race (especially as a white person) one has to really think about why one prefers a race over another. There’s a whole labyrinth of exotification and fantasy of the ‘other’ that one can fall into.

Unless we blindly accept any child that is given to us by an adoption agency, we are privileging certain social/physical conditions over others. Perhaps the ethical choice would then be to have your own children because that way you do not have to choose one child over another.

Finally, adoption is very expensive. You’d have to be very economically well off to adopt one or more children from an agency. On one hand, it is fair to say that only people who can afford to take good care of a child economically and socially should be allowed to adopt. On the contrary, it denies many people the right to adopt and is worryingly classist in its process.

In South Asia though, adoption has been marked by a very different narrative. In many cases, one adopts a child of a close family relative when one isn’t able to conceive. Although inability to conceive can be a reason to adopt anywhere in the world, it is rather unique in that it is done free of cost with no agencies or formal processes involved. One can also just adopt any child from an orphanage again without the legalities that surround adoption  in the West. Who funds these orphanages and how these children end up there is altogether a separate matter. The nuances of issues within that cultural narrative give it yet another context and there is no one clear ethical choice.

With all these concerns in mind, it’s not easy to say what one should do. There isn’t a should in any ethical choice, really. I do know that I love children a lot (they’re the only real humans as Holden Caulfield would say) and if I do end up adopting or having kids of my own one day, I hope this post doesn’t come back to haunt me. How I fail in raising them as decent human beings is for another day.

P.S: I relate to Holden Caulfield being very drawn to children and wanting to be the Catcher in the Rye that saves all the children in the world from the terrible world that awaits them but like Holden, I’m too caught up in my head to do anything about it. Nihilist, much.


Rest in Peace Asim

You will always be alive through your work.


New Year’s Resolution

Look, it’s not cool to make fun of people.

It’s not cool to make fun of somebody for being fat, being disabled, being an Arab, being Chinese, being old, being illiterate, being gay, being religious, wearing a hijab, having a beard, not being a specific gender, being drunk, being sexually active or just being someone you are not. It’s not to cool to hate them for it either. Stop it.

Don’t even it do it for humour’s sake. It’s not funny. You’re being a dick. Don’t be a dick. Seriously, don’t.

Let’s try to respect other people’s differences and choices. Let’s hear their unique stories. Let’s try and include narratives of different people in their own voices in the mainstream.

I will try at least. That’s my new year’s resolution.

Here’s to a better 2010.

(this was inspired by this tweet last night.)


Memories of Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan

I was 10 years old when Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan passed away on August 16, 1997. Later than week I was reading the Quran under my maulvi saheb’s supervision, a regular feature of my life for a good decade. My maulvi was a mild-mannered, kind man who took special interest in our religious education. This particular week he wanted to know if I knew Nusrat’s music. I shrugged. I liked that song in Aishwariya Rai and Bobby Deol’s movie that he’d sung. Just as much as any other kid consuming copious amounts of Bollywood I suppose. Maulvi saheb, bless him, praised Nusrat’s music for a few seconds and told me that his music was a great gift to our country. Then in a typical contradictory fashion he warned me off the terrible snakes and leeches that awaited him in his grave because Nusrat had sinned greatly. He had indulged in music and the punishment for that would be horrible things eating his vocal cords till the Day of Judgment. He said Nusrat will pay the price for the vice he spread. I remember being so upset about it.

I hated how hypocritical it sounded and didn’t understand why the punishment would be so cruel if all he did was ‘give a great gift to our country’.

Thankfully, years later I purged myself off such lies and such people. And Nusrat’s music still lives on in my heart. Here’s to the halka halka suroor I will indulge in tonight. Here’s to Nusrat.

*clink*

Mein Azal Say Banda-E-Ishq Hoon, Mujhe Zohd-O-Kufr Ka Gham Nahin
Mere Sar Ko Dar Tera Mil Gaya, Mujhe Ab Talash-E-Huram Nahin

Main Kehta Reh Gaya Khuta-E-Mohabbat Ki Achi Saza Di
Mere Dil Ki Duniya Buna Kur Mitta Di

Mere Baad Kisko Satao Ge?
Mujhe Kis Tarah Se Mitao Ge?


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,197 other followers