ad nauseum, ad infinitum.

For someone who doesn’t like watching TV, I end up watching it quite frequently with surprising gusto. Leaving the telly on while having dinner has inadvertently become the norm even though I was zealously against even owning one just a couple of years ago.  If it is not over a meal, it is disguised as spending quality time with family where nobody has to talk if you turn up the volume loud enough.

More often than, watching TV in Pakistan is profoundly irritating.

First of, drama serials would have you believe that every woman in Pakistan is banned from getting an education, forced into marrying her twice divorced 65 year old maternal uncle, thrown into eternal domestic servitude and then beaten up if she wants to visit her mum once in six months. All of this she bears with muted discomfort and still manages to ‘love’ her in laws dearly. If it is not the quintessential voiceless Pakistani woman, it is her anti-thesis: the rebellious brat who has elaborate daddy issues and would rather sleep with whoever’s got more money than deal with her step-mum’s humble rishta requests.

Juxtaposed against these women are two archetypal men: the vadeyrawho has not been able to give adequate time to his daughter after his fifth wife left him because of his alcoholism, and the stupendously chocolate-y hero who woos our heroine with his decency and innocence but basically just wants to get into her pants like everyone else.

Welcome to Pakistan. The land of no in-betweens, no complex characters,and no grey spots in otherwise black and white tales. Our scriptwriters and storytellers are stuck in antediluvian times where every person is either all good or all evil. Pandering to epic clichés in dialogue and horrid deus ex machina moments, Pakistani drama serials have managed to give a whole new meaning to suspension of disbelief. The tragedy is that their collective delusions of grandeur have them thinking they are encouraging critical thinking on Pakistan’s problems. Newsflash: they are not.

Flipping the channel brings no respite. Almost as if mirroring the hysteria on soaps, there is our knightly cavalcade of political analysts, news anchors, pundits and overnight experts who tries it’s earnest to add to the cacophony every night. Somewhere, someone in a newsroom decided that the best way to convince your audience is by shrieking every syllable of your argument. To add to ratings of these shows, imbeciles and self-aggrandizing ‘thought-leaders’ are brought as guests. The idea is to basically surroundthe host with enoughspecialists that the collective IQ in the room goes into minus. Genius.

To assist you in not ever having to put yourself through the deafening din again, I’m going to sum up the totality of their Analysis-On-Everything-Out-There: it is India’s fault. If Rule Number 1 doesn’t apply, please substitute it with Zionist pigs or Degenerate Americans or Venal Politicians or any variation thereof. Works with shocking accuracy each time.

It is quite befitting for a country that has so many complex problems that the best way to think about them is to not do so at all. Or let the good folks on TV do the thinking for you.

If by now you’ve not become comatose, there is always the erstwhile advertisements that will make you finally throw your TV out of maddening rage. There is a Golden Rule when it comes to advertising and I’m pretty sure it is etched in papyrus somewhere. It says ‘annoy the hell out of your audience and they will buy whatever you’re selling’.

There are a few ways one can literally follow this rule. Firstly, creating an adand then playing it over and over and over and over again about 37 times in an hour ad infinitum, ad nauseum. This ensures brand recall. Secondly, by employing the most earth-shatteringly irritating jingles, catch-phrases and slogans you can find. This leads to brand hype. Finally, by lying through your teeth about the product you’re selling. This leads to brand loyalty (hey, who’ll find out anyway?).

And with that we arrive at the brilliant formula being used in Pakistani TV today. Right after a harrowing day at work you nestle in front of the idiot box and switch to your choice of drama serial of the day. Within moments of the opening credits, it cuts to a commercial break. You watch a couple of them thinking the show will be back on any minute. 15 minutes later, it is still commercial break and you’ve watched the same washing power ad bajillion times already. You switch to the talk show on today’s current events. There is an intelligent intro by a senior journalist that has piqued your interest but before you could grasp the nuances of the issue, they introduce their guest of the day. It is the same 3 goons sitting in political opposition who have parroted the exact same non-statement for the nth time. You switch back to the drama serial. By now you missed a good few minutes and a dramatic slap. Your heroine is wailing uncontrollably alone in her room when there is a mysterious phone call. Cut to commercial break.

Lather. Rinse. Repeat.


Pakistan Drama Serials: A Feminist Nightmare

For the last couple of months, my mother and I have been hooked to TV serials running on Hum TV, ARY and Geo TV. Most of the high profile ones are, mercifully, quite short and wrap up the entire plot in 15 to 16 weeks.  The quality of production is impressive and there is commendable acting talent. Stories of political scandals, love, money and family drama on a backdrop of extraordinary wealth and lavish set designs, have indeed found a niche and are, admittedly, addictive.

The glitz and the glamour, notwithstanding, some very disturbing trends beg the question of what we’re internalising as consumers of Pakistani soaps. Perhaps it is futile to ask, yet again, the erstwhile question of whether life imitates art or art imitates life. But then again, with every new trend in popular culture, it might be worth digging a little deeper in what are obvious red herrings, lest it is accepted as legitimate representation.

The first glaring problem is the role assigned to women in most (if not all) of these TV serials. Whether a woman or a man writes the plot, all characters written for women are not just expectedly cliché, but also shocking at times.  Women are either decidedly passive, silenced by the men in their lives (for e.g. Yaarian on Geo TV, Qaid-e-Tanhayee on Hum TV), or stubborn, incoherent rebels out to shame their families (for e.g. Paarsa on Hum TV or Haal-e-Dil on ARY). Then there are others who exude classic patriarchy by opposing female education and arranging forced marriages (e.g. Qaid-e-Tanhayee on Hum TV).  Stereotypes are aplenty: even where there are female lead roles depicting strong, independent women, one finds them in the toughest of circumstances going through some far-fetched trauma. In they end they either capitulate to the classic demands of the society or end up leaving the country (for e.g. Ishq-e-Gumshuda on Hum TV or Haal-e-Dil on ARY).

Most of these stories revolve around elite families in Pakistan and their personal strife.  I come from a fairly privileged background myself and yet, after watching at least six of these shows till the end, there was not a single woman I could relate to. Why is the narrative of oppression the only available narrative on TV in Pakistan? Despite the economic hardship, the daily frustrations of a patriarchal society and lack of choices prevalent around us, there are many of us who lead fulfilling lives and do not choose male domination as the singular underlying narrative of our life.

Increasingly, these drama serials have become an echo chamber for ridiculous ideas regarding education, marriage, career, love reiterated by women themselves. This would not be a problem had we a variety of opinions being voiced by female characters but that is not the case. Nearly every single show on T.V. today has a couple of token women who spew self-righteous inanities about not educating their daughters, suspecting their daughter’s intentions when they go out of the house, restricting women’s mobility in urban settings, distrusting women’s choices of who to marry and so on and so forth. These women then go around reprimanding others who are going astray and the old blame and shame game ensues.

It is important to point out that these characters are deliberate caricatures developed either to mock the increasingly conservative mass consciousness or to hold up a mirror to the society. In voicing these opinions, it is quite apparent that most of these producers, writers, and directors are laughing at the women they are writing about. But that isn’t the contention here. It is the sheer prevalence of such characters that is the problem. It is as if an alternative conversation about women and their lives in Pakistan is impossible or non-existent.

Lastly, while some attempt is made to include a cross-section of society in the characters to make it more representative of class divides in the country, most of the successful stories were based on lives of the exceedingly rich and their disconnect from the world outside their mansions. It is quite an absurd site to behold where, on one hand there is a huge house spread over thousands of yards that most Pakistanis cannot relate to, and on the other hand there are these people living in these houses that think and behave like the writers expect the larger populace to think and behave.

Women travel with ease to foreign countries, divorce cheating husbands, run their ex-husbands businesses but yet confront the most horrifying backlash when say, falling in love with a person with disability. Sitting in an expansive mansion, we see a head-strong young woman miserable because her father threatens to get her killed if she continues to meet her blind friend and her gradual acceptance that daddy knows best. In fact, by the end of it most of these women resign to a fate ordained by other people controlling their lives. Again, I’m not saying this does not happen but I am saying that they do not reflect millions of Pakistani women who did not fit this drama serial narrative. What is more, they are also not representative of so many Pakistani men who are, in fact, progressive, supportive and enabling of women’s choices.

It is alienating to watch this night after night; to enjoy it as entertainment one either has to totally disconnect from it or employ the proverbial suspension of disbelief. But alas, I am probably going to continue watching these drama serials as they attempt to unfold the all-Pakistani woman’s story. Due to a troubling lack of variety on the telly, all absurdities, contradictions, generalisations and caveats be damned.


Edward Said On Faiz In Exile In Beirut

The other day I’d come across this anecdote from Eqbal Ahmed’s “Confronting Empire” where on page 38 he talks about this evening in Beirut where they had dinner with Faiz Ahmed Faiz. A couple of days later Edward Said’s “The Mind of Winter: Reflections on Life in Exile” came via Salmaan in the mail (thanks to Sepoy over at Chapati Mystery. Or was it Khanum?).

Said narrates the same night in Beirut below in ‘The Mind of Winter’:


Faiz Ahmed Faiz on Sadequain

aaj tak surkh-o-siyah sadiyoñ ké saaye talay // aadam-o-havaa ki aulaad pé kiya guzri hai

“Retrospectively, he began quietly enough painting living things as appearances, but even then, in selection and treatment, he was more of a commentator than a mere naturalist? From things phenomena, he chose only those, which were alive and trying to ‘kick’ however, ineffectually. And in his social community the only living ones are those who toil like, the camel, the ox who is the hewer of wood and the drawer of water, the famished cactus, or the root under the stone. And to paint the figure together with its suffering obviously dictated a distortion of visual appearance, a juxtaposition of the conceptual and the material.

In the process, he also evolved a new social and emotional credo of the essential unity of material things, all caught in the agonizing toils of an evolutionary process of struggle goading them upwards. And now, since his return from Paris, Sadequain has once more reverted to direct social comment to depict a loveless and macabre world a world of the scare-crow acting as the Lord of blood-thirsty crows, of the harridan decked out as a beauty queen, a world of trapped tongues and cob-webbed hearts, of debased flesh and servile manners. Filtering across this world we see a Christ-like Figure perhaps meant to be autobiographical, his body covered with thorns, his head encircled by the crown of atrophied oblivion. This bitter vision of reality may not be the whole truth but it is certainly a part of it and if some of those immediately confronted with the hypocrisy and the heartlessness of a particular environment fail to own the hope beyond the despair, the failure is not entirely theirs.”

- Faiz Ahmad Faiz

Full text of the letter and the rest of Sadequain’s paintings on Faiz’s shayrs can be found here


Aurat Ne Janam Diya MardoN Ko – Saahir Ludhianvi


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,197 other followers